Good lord, you go away for a day and leave the door open
and the fucktards just stagger on in like houseflies. Witness:
You guys did a nice job stereotyping all liberals as hypocritical idiots. I guess that just shows your own ignorance.
You have misrepresented the consensus view. Which climate scientists have said “the world is coming to an end†as you have suggested? The issue isn’t that the world will end but that human life on earth will become increasingly difficult do to global warming.
Now I’m sure you badasses here don’t worry about that kind of stuff, especially since you believe the radical islamists are going to kill you first. How’s that for a bit of stereotyping on my part?
Let’s dissect this, shall we?
You guys did a nice job stereotyping all liberals as hypocritical idiots. I guess that just shows your own ignorance.
A stereotype is a perception that you impose on someone you don’t understand. I’m actually stating facts. Sorry for the confusion. Try and keep up.
You have misrepresented the consensus view. Which climate scientists have said “the world is coming to an end†as you have suggested? The issue isn’t that the world will end but that human life on earth will become increasingly difficult do to global warming.
Consensus is not science. Please do try very hard to keep up, the rest of the class would like to move on. And I would be happy to accept that the “do” instead of the proper “due” is simply a typo, but the letters are nowhere near each other on the keyboard. Try a bit harder to use the language, it helps people who are trying to have a serious discussion.
Now I’m sure you badasses here don’t worry about that kind of stuff, especially since you believe the radical islamists are going to kill you first. How’s that for a bit of stereotyping on my part?
Ah, so you think there is such a thing as a “radical islamist” Actually, an “islamist” is also often called a “muslim”. Some pronounce it “Moose-limb”. Please make a note. And please attempt to understand the nature of Islam first, because your ignorance of it here clearly illustrates why liberals are, in the main, immune to facts of any kind.
And then there’s this gem:
Actually, the prediction was 2-10 metres in the IPCC report…But then again, you neo-conic guys always assume we brag as badly as you do…
What is it Rush says? “it ain’t braggin if you can do it”
Refuted quickly and accurately by Mr Pascal, who permeates the fact proof screen of the left with such incredible ease. Thank you, amigo.
13 comments Og | Uncategorized

Consensus is not science.
Talk about a blatant non sequitur. Actually, calling that statement a non sequitur gives it too much credit. How about a “meaningless series of words strung together by an imbecile trying to sound smart.”
Do you know the first thing about the philosophy of science? Are you even remotely acquainted with the phrase “scientific consensus”? Ever heard of “peer review,” fucktard? Heh heh, he said fucktard, Beavis.
Oh please, educate us further on global warming, Mr. Consensus-Is-Not-Science.
This is hilarious.
Indeed, rland. Please direct your attention to this post:
http://neanderpundit.com/?p=922
What a fucking retard…
Does that boy even begin to understand a single word he typed?
Even dismissing consensus, there is no consensus.
The majority of climate scientists DO NOT AGREE. The statements that “the majority of…” are always tainted pools, such as “those contributing to the…” or “members of…”
There is no consensus because there is no science there. There is no correlation of C02 to global warming, except that C02 rises as a RESULT of warmer temperatures, ie, that C02 increases are caused BY warming, not the other way around. C02 rises lag behind warmer temperatures. Man is not causing temperatures to rise. Period. End of discussion. We’re not that important.
Damn! Connie Reads neanderpundit! Even just once!
According to ice core samples, CO2 increases lagged behind temperature increases by anywhere from 400 to 800 years.
Coincidentally that’s about the same period of time it would take for an increase in solar radiation to heat the world’s oceans enough to, you guessed it, release significantly larger amounts of CO2.
Facts omitted deliberately because they don’t support the eco-socialist take over of our daily lives.
Ya wanna be scared? They even read me every once in a while.
The statements that “the majority of…†are always tainted pools
Try telling that to your MD sometime. Or do you not partake of medical advances that are established as a result of scientific consensus?
There is no correlation of C02 to global warming
Got a citation for that? You know, like from a scientist.
According to ice core samples, CO2 increases lagged behind temperature increases by anywhere from 400 to 800 years.
Uh, cite?
And I would love to see a citation for this one:
Man is not causing temperatures to rise. Period. End of discussion.
It must have been one hell of a study that established that “fact.” Can’t wait to hear about it.
Next up, we’ll talk flying spaghetti monsters and logical fallacies.
Rland, please cite your sources. No, wait, you don’t have any. I can, if I choose, cite sources to support any of the assertions made here, but frankly, you are not worth the effort. And this is not how the game is played: You come here and make an assertion, and then you prove it beyond a shadow of a doubt. Until you can,. which you can’t, you lose. I suppose you must be used to that by now.
I only need to cite myself on the last point Please read and understand.
Next up, we discuss why global warming morons can not actually participate in a discussion.
Hell Og, I can explain that – global warming is their religion. No, wait, that’s not quite right.
It’s not a religion, it’s a cult. One big gaia loving Jim Jones-like group who revile the non-believers and do their best to shriek over anyone else’s objections.
Wiki says this is a crock of shit…
“This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia’s quality standards.
Please discuss this issue on the talk page or replace this tag with a more specific message.
This article has been tagged since October 2006.”
Wich means it is flawed and would not be accepted as a refrence by any educational institution. By the way I work at one and we frown on Wiki and you will be surprised how many of the “philosophy” related students blatantly cut and paste from wiki… too lazy to make their own assumptions and views…
As mentioned real science studies facts or tests theories with experimentation… not pipe dreams.
Can you tell me why all the planets are showing signs of increased surface tempreature… refrences abound on the internet, use your own time to Google for them, not mine… I have to go and burn some hydrocarbons on my smoke emmiting MX bike…
Og… my rant directed at the GoreBot rland, just in case there was some confusion… :-)
robc, you did a fine job.