Support the troops, support their mission
On today, I’d like to raise a distinction that a lot have ignored, or take for granted.
Supporting the troops means supporting their mission.
The mission of our troops- all political nonsense aside- is to keep Muslim terrorism from flooding the USA.
If you labor under the impression that Islam is peaceful or Muslims aren’t out to do us harm, you are patently an idiot.
If you don’t support the troops, if you don’t support their mission, it means you don’t care if their way of life infects the USA.
it means you are OK with Muslims murdering innocents in the name of their ideology
it means you are OK with Muslims converting our country to a theorcracy
it means you are OK with Muslims oppressing women in whatever way they choose.
it means you are OK with Muslims destroying Israel and murdering all the Jews.
It means you are OK with a 100 percent male dominated society
It means you are OK with complete male dominance over females at all times.
it means you are OK with complete male control of women’s ‘reproductive freedom”
it means you are OK with “honor killings“- women murdered because of some real or imagined slight to the men.
it means you are OK with female genital mutilation– the removal of all or parts of a woman’s genitals so that she is incapable of experiencing sexual pleasure, and so that the man may be more adequately serviced and pleased.
All of these things are imposed in every country where Islam takes hold. And if you think to yourself “That can’t happen here” do a little googling. All these things are already happening in areas of the USA.
No, not all muslims practice FGM. Not all muslims practice honor killings. But if you aren’t OK with the troops keeping Islam at bay in the east, you are OK with anything any of them bring here.
I am not. I respect women- yes, even those who don’t respect themselves- and I will not stand by and allow my wife, my daughter, my friends be subjected to the kind of opression Islam brings. So I support the troops and their mission.
Count me in Og! I support the troops, their ,mission and the United States of America.
I support the troops. I support their mission.
I don’t trust our elected officials in Washington to let them do the job. The only question is whether they want to sell us out to the damn Islamists first or wait until it’s the United States of Aztlan’s problem….
What Graumagus said. I support the troops and their mission, and I would like to untie their hands and let them loose to do their jobs.
Politicians: Bah.
I’d like to outlaw Islam from being practiced within our borders.
Then, kick every last one of the little bastards out.
Institute the Blackjack Pershing method of taking care of their dead and Islam will shut up again. And even if they don’t they will think twice about desecrating our dead again. I support the troops and their mission.
I support the troops and the mission of defeating our enemies abroad, lest we have to face them here. We should not be there to “rebuild their infrastructure” (we have a damn many infrastructures of our own that are crumbling) unless it’s part of the g.w.o.t. That’s for the U.N. and the Peace Corps to screw up, not the military. By the way, where are THEY in this rebuilding thing? Same for winning hearts & minds that hated us for 1400 years.
Before we send anyone “over there” to die and see things an American should never have to see, we should hate the enemy so much for the fact that we had to send “Billy” to war that we aim for their utter destruction and defeat. Hate them for making hate necessary.
My being upset over 3000 dead is the polar opposite of the left’s, for me it is wondering how many of them died (and how many have been maimed) due to the fact that we want to win the war the “nice” way, being extra careful, instead of napalming a city every time an IED blows up a HMMWV. And for not skinning al Sadr alive as a warning to other “clerics” who want to raise a militia. The Nazis and Imperial Japanese raised no militias to ferment guerrilla war after WWII, for they knew we’d brutally wipe out any insurrection.
So when did this become their mission? I’m just curious. The mission keeps changing on us, doesn’t it. And, oddly, you know, if you look at the evidence, as opposed to what you folks keep claiming is happening, none of those things (like women’s rights and honor killings and us over here getting safer) are actually happening as an effect of our troops dying in Iraq, are they? I mean, women in Iraq used to be able to go about their lives in relative freedom. Now they have to wear the scarf and now they get harassed at a higher rate — and that’s those of them who aren’t being killed by terrorists and stray bullets. And me, I just don’t fly anymore in our fine country, because I don’t much like being treated like a terrorist in the country where I used to be a free citizen. What have we gained, exactly? What mission is it that got accomplished, again?
Welcome to Neanderpundit. Questus. Here’s your ass.
http://neanderpundit.com/?p=1541
Personally, I was fine with letting Muslims do whatever the hell they wanted in their own countries until 9/11. I used to be a very “live and let live” kinda guy.
But now I realize that Islam is a diseased ideology, and needs to be wiped out.
I’d prefer to see it simply reform and become tolerant of other religions. However, since there’s a time limit (Muslim nuclear weapon acquisition), I’m open-minded to the option of simply killing those who believe that Jihad is a good idea.