Ankle deep in stupid
headfirst
John Warner (fucktard, Virginia) has introduced a “gas conservation bill”, (S. 3266, the “Immediate Steps to Conserve Gasoline Act.â€).
Now, before I even bother to run into a long rant about the mind numbing ignorance of this, and what utter anencephaly it demonstrates, let’s look at what this claims it will do, shall we?
Supposedly this measure will save 167,000 barrels of oil per day. But we use over 20 million barrels a day. So in the long run, less than a percent.
Let’s look at how gas gets used, then. When a car is at speed, say 65-85 mph, very little gas is used to keepit going. At speed 9Whcih is why highway mileage ratings are higher) the engine is just ticking along, keeping the speed up, especially with overdrives on modern vehicle transmissions. So the vast majority of the fuel use takes place during acceleration, because the vast majority of the work is required to overcome the inertia of the vehicle. Sure, at the higher speeds, it’s harder to push something lie a truck or a van through wind, but most of the vehicles on the road today are remarkably aerodynamic.
So where was i? Oh, yes: Accelerating, and braking. If you accelerate, you use the most fuel. If you brake, you’re taking that inertia you created, and just turning it into wasted, non usable heat. Where is acceleration and braking taking place most? Cities, and traffic. Out in flyover country, acceleration is not breackneck, because those country boys know they’ll get there. And they often coast to a stop, using every damned erg of that precious gas. if you never drove in the country, you have no idea.
So if hard accel and hard braking are using the fuel, where does that take place?
Predominantly, blue cities. In fact, if you want to find stop and go traffic, you almost have to go to a heavily democrat area.
So the people that are gunning their engines, squealing their brakes, honking their horns, and flipping the bird at fellowe drivers, are predominantly
Democrat.
No study is being done on this (of course) but I’d venture to guess that FAR more than a measly percent could be saved by stopping the foolishness that is “typical”city driving and expressway construction. So again, the few (who can’t drive 55 anyway) rather than change THEIR habits, want the people who aren’t causing the problem to make sacrifices.
Color me surprised. NOT.
12 comments Og | Uncategorized

“Out in flyover country, acceleration is not breakneck”
Out in the country in Oregon, people tend to drive like a bat out of hell, braking for curves and accelerating out of them, but your greater point stands. I’d also be very curious to see any correlations between poor driving manners and political orientation. It would probably be a good companion piece to the book “Who really cares?”.
Geez, we really have a pair here in the Commonwealth, don’t we? Between Warner’s senility and Webb’s temper, it’s no wonder we’re a laughingstock…
“55” didn’t work in the 70’s, and it ain’t gonna work now.
Check out motorists.org for more info.
With all this talk of fuel savings if the speed limit is reduced, I have yet to hear anyone address the value of the time that will be lost should this occur.
Roughly speaking, it would take a trucker a little over 14 hrs. to haul a load at an avg. speed of 70 mph. At 55 mph it would take him a bit over 18 hr. A four hour difference.
Most independent truckers haul on a $ per mile rate but if you convert it to $ per hour
at 55 mph his hourly income would drop 22% due to the addition time of the haul.
Whether the fuel saving would off set this I do not know but I doubt there would be much overall saving in the end.
I think the 55 MPH speed limit is a very bad idea. I would not be surprised if driving 55 MPH would save fuel. I would make a guess that max fuel economy for my car is the lowest speed you can manage in 5th gear without lugging the engine. Which is about 45 MPH I think. I certainly would never consider driving 45 on the Interstate though.
Nobody obeyed the 55 MPH speed limit when the Carter Administration mandated it. The entire I-465 loop around Indianapolis has a 55 MPH speed limit. Nobody drives that show. Passing a national 55 MPH speed limit would be the classic feel good while having no effect in the real world. The only vehicles that would obey the 55 MPH speed limit are company owned semis that are equipped with road speed governors.
Actually I predict the two most likely effects are a slight drop in diesel fuel consumption and and increase in auto accidents by drivers trying to pass slow moving semi trucks.
Pretty clever thinking, Og. Guess this is why we pay you the big bucks, huh?
While it is a proven scientific fact that fuel mileage increases at more moderate speeds than 70mph, 55mph is nowhere close to the answer.
I could rip off posts day after day on this issue as it’s now become very personal to me.
The biggest problem?
Every last one of us Americans saw this coming, and we did nothing to prepare for the oil price increases.
If somebody tells me they didn’t see this coming, I’ll beat them to death with a 5 gallon gas can for their unabashed ignorance.
If we attempt to blame the Democrats, or Republicans, or Detroit, Riyadh, or Tokyo, we’d look like even bigger fools.
Nope, I’m not gonna get started. I’ll only get pissed off.
drill, drill, and then drill some more. While we are at it, build some new refineries and some of those new spiffy minature nuclear power plants I’ve been reading about.
Kick any democrat out of office, where ever you find them. They are the party of problems, not answers.
Dick, it’s human nature to wait until a problem is at a critical stage before taking the hard steps to remedy it; the harder, the longer we wait. Remember horsing around with those baby teeth instead of just yanking them when they first came loose, and everyone in high school did their term papers the night before they were due.
This is going to hurt like the automation of the steel and auto industries did. They could’ve handled those issues gracefully in the ’60’s & ’70’s instead of the ice water shock treatment of the early ’80’s massive layoffs which ruined a lot of families, but oh well there’s my point proven again. Overall, the country will survive this.
In the meantime I’m looking for a cheap-ass wood burner to supplement my gas furnace for this winter (if you think gasoline is bad, wait for natural gas), but that seems an impossible task. They’re all $2000+, and no one is letting go of theirs used on the cheap, and I don’t want to burn the house down with something faulty. I want to stay warm, but not that warm. Hell, if the gubmint insulated their buildings, natural gas pricing would come down and we’d all be ok for the winter.
mts,
As I type, they’re drilling for natural gas (Google- Barnett Shale) on my property. It took this mess to get them to do it though.
What- in your driveway? Man, I wish I had natural gas.
Wait… that didn’t come out right.. oh, nevermind.
Og, you have plenty of NG. Ya just got to figure out how to pipe it somewhere other than under the covers at 3am!
Methane means never having to say you’re sorry.
And I would go a couple of steps further…drill, drill, drill…add more refineries, stop the cafe blends of petrol, and build, build, build, the nuke power plants….rinse lather repeat!!