More purulence from Charles
who opines thusly:
Maybe you should do your own fucking research :)
But here’s the simplest form of it. You might understand it at your level.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_anarchist_communities
Wow, wikipedia, what a solid piece of research. Look, charlie baby, I can also google and click on the very first link i see. But if you bothered to do ANY RESEARCH YOURSELF or even READ THE WIKIPEDIA LINK YOU SENT ME, YOU FUCKTARD, you would see that anarchies always eventually fail. Some with a whimper, many with a bang. But let me direct your attention, because you probably have reading comprehension difficulties, to part of the link you sent to me: Here’s an INCREDIBLY successful anarchy. Nobody from outside attempted to force them to do anything. They had complete rein to do whatever they want, and they did it ALL right. And it lasted nine whole years. Here’s the real story of what happened. You might look carefully at it. It shows that under even the most optimal of circumstances, Anarchism fails, Surely you won’t like the Free Republic link, nor the fact that Rush is telling the story, but you can go ahead and prove that it is wrong. No wait, you can’t.
Where do they come from, and what on earth sends them here? Dick, did you ever find that “idiots welcome” sign? I gotta take that down.

When you get old and stupid like I am you don’t even read the signs anymore son.
I have had similiar arguments with libertarians and such like and you ain’t gonna win this one. Folks need a moral code to believe in and once they pick their horse they will stick with it to the bitter end regardless of where it takes them. Some people got to piss on the electric fence before they will understand that it isn’t a good idea.
Actually, you win these arguments by ignoring the trolls.
more fun whacking them, nathan
Yeah, somedays you just gotta scratch where it itches.
Next thing you know, trolls will be citing Jon Stewart and Steven Colbert.
They already quote Tina Fey…
Huh. I thought Stewart and Colbert were trolls.
Charles, take your pick. Get a hobby or I’m gonna ruin your day.
I had that debate with the psych prof and a bunch of his students when HST was President.
As I remember, we wound up agreeing that the maximum
sustainable population of an
anarchist community is around 36. More than that and there will be enough gullible people that the community will fall into the “absolute monarchy” trap, and fail.
Usually accompanied by the spectacular appearance of the Apocalyptic Four Horsemen.
The number may be a dozen off either way, but anarchistic societies do not survive.
Pete Allen