More on vision
yesterday’s post talked about the basics of vision, and the way the act of identifying an image can be somewhat simplified; Now I want to address Ed’s idea of Quantum computers, which is an inspired one.
Everything that takes place in a computer has to do with a 0, or a 1. All personal computers are made like this, and it hasn’t changed in years.
Not too far around the corner, are quantum computers, which will be able to deal with a lot more than just 0 and 1. Imagine a person who is paralyzed and can only move his eyeball. It can look left, and it can look right, and people can interpret that left and right as yes and no.
Now imagine that the person develops the ability to move his eye to multiple positions. he can look at a screen, and a camera can record the position of his eye. The screen can be full of letters, and he can look at each letter in turn.
Old way of communicating:
a? no
b? no
c? no
d? yes
the first letter is d
a? no
b? no
c? no
d? no
e? no
f? no
g? no
all the way to
r? yes
the first letter is D, the second is R
until the poor bastard spells “Drink” by which time he has died of thirst.
With the letterboard, the person can swivel his eye to “D_R_I_N_K” in a few seconds. Replace the letters- or suppliment them- with words, and now you can get to pretty normal communications fairly quickly. This, by the way, is similar to the way Stephen Hawking communicates.
Now think of a computer that has the ability to process data not one bit at a time but by having the ability to look at multiple possibilities at once for every input. This isn’t exactly the way it works but the analogy is close enough for comparison. A piecre of data comes into a transistor and makes the transistor output either a 0 or a 1, a piece of data comes into a Quantum “transistor” (for lack of a better term) and can be any value between 0 and 1, or it can be 0, or 1, or 0 AND 1.
So like Ed says, instead of going to each of 100 rooms and answering the yes/no question of “Are my keys here’ each time until you find the keys, you can ask the Quantum computer ‘Which room are my keys in?” and it looks in all of them at once.
I think Ed is on to something here, in that this is the way the human mind works; I additionally think the distinction between memory and processor is blurred as to be almost nonexistent, and the same brain cells that store the information can also process it. Tis makes our whole wetware system a sort of a quantum supercomputer that can not only store, retrieve, and process information, but do so running at clock speeds that are astounding, when compared to the most powerful computers today.
But that’s changing.

Does that mean that dimocrats can think logically too? Nawww that can’t be. They must be the 32 kb’s of humans.
Roger
Considering that quantum mechanics is itself (at times) counter-intuitive, the nature of superposition is often hard for some people to grasp.
The quantum transistor, for example, being at both 0 and 1. “How can it be both?”
I can’t explain it; I can only say that we’ve done it. There are some experiments which have placed an atom into a superpositional state, and the states have been physically seperated by some nontrivial distance. The atom essentially exists in two places at once! But it exists as a fog of probability, exactly the way Shroedinger’s Cat is supposed to be in that famous thought experiment.
All of this is meant to demonstrate how weird quantum physics are. But they work; and the principles of quantum computing–though strange and counter-intuitive–certainly do explain some of the more mystifying aspects of the workings of the human brain.
Thanks, Ed, for stimulating an interesting discussion. I’m no physicist but I can understand this stuf when people like you parse it, and I understand the real world applications, which most don’t.
With more work being done concerning time, that it’s our human limitation of living in the now, while acknowledging “the past” and “the future” as either having taken place or as going to take place; it’s examples such as the one given by Ed above, that gets one to thinking about there being no past or future, that time “just is”.
Very interesting conversation indeed.