Are not designed with beauty in mind, for the most part, though many of them are indeed beautiful, if only by accident. My M1 Carbine is prettier than most, if only by virtue of having a great stock. The lines of a 1911 Swiss rifle, or a Swedish Mauser, or a Springfield 1873 Trapdoor. All of these rifles have a beauty, imparted by their designers, that has transcended their original purpose.

It would be easy to say they contain a soul that more modern firearms do not, but I don’t think that is the case, they are weapons of war designed to be the best at their respective time. If there was an easily moldable material known as Flimflamulite that was readily available at the beginning of firearms manufacture, all stocks would be made of it, and firearms with wood would be looked upon as weird, or “Steampunk”. No, it’s an utter accident that guns had wood stocks, and a lot now don’t, because there are materials other than wood available, and they work very well.

Still:

“This weapon of iron and wood” sort of loses something when you say “This weapon of plastic and aluminum”.

Suppose it gets the job done, but I still like my M1 Carbine.