How things are.
Mark Twain, who famously (Read his biography) had issues figuring out how windows worked in relation to his household alarm system, was demonstrably not a technical man. And yet, he understands what technical men are like, for he is, during his life, surrounded by them. An excerpt from “Yankee”
“I am an American. I was born and reared in Hartford, in the State of Connecticut — anyway, just over the river, in the country. So I am a Yankee of the Yankees — and practical; yes, and nearly barren of sentiment, I suppose — or poetry, in other words. My father was a blacksmith, my uncle was a horse doctor, and I was both, along at first. Then I went over to the great arms factory and learned my real trade; learned all there was to it; learned to make everything: guns, revolvers, cannon, boilers, engines, all sorts of labor-saving machinery. Why, I could make anything a body wanted — anything in the world, it didn’t make any difference what; and if there wasn’t any quick new-fangled way to make a thing, I could invent one — and do it as easy as rolling off a log. I became head superintendent; had a couple of thousand men under me.”
That is the type of man John Galt is designed to resemble, writ somewhat larger, perhaps, but with the same ink.
Hank goes on later to discuss his “new” position.
“I was just as much at home in that century as I could have been in any other; and as for preference, I wouldn’t have traded it for the twentieth. Look at the opportunities here for a man of knowledge, brains, pluck, and enterprise to sail in and grow up with the country. The grandest field that ever was; and all my own; not a competitor; not a man who wasn’t a baby to me in acquirements and capacities; whereas, what would I amount to in the twentieth century? I should be foreman of a factory, that is about all; and could drag a seine down street any day and catch a hundred better men than myself.”
This is a world where one could “Go Galt” because Hank was the ONLY one of his kind. Unfortunately, he went about making himself obsolete by training others to be him. And some petty witchery gets to him, in the end.
Also unfortunately, this is a fantasy, just like Shrugged is a fantasy; Twain being Twain, at least his fantasy is compelling and entertaining, and was never meant to be anything but that. The sheer volume of Rand acolytes whose feathers get horribly ruffled if you suggest her vision was not superhuman is amazing to me; as Tam says, it’s a novel, a fictional one. The caliber of people who read that novel and latch onto it’s wierdness is identical to the caliber of people who watch Farenheit 911 and think it’s the Word of God.

“Unfortunately, he went about making himself obsolete by training others to be him. ”
No-one is indespensible. That is how it OUGHT to be.
It would truly be a terrifying world if my livelyhood, my life… was dependent on an individual other than myself.
That. Is. Slavery.
The thing that separates Adult from Children is being able to differentiate twixt Reality and Fantasy. I’ve been something of a Wet Blanket my whole life as I’ve tried to inject a little reality into situations along the way by saying, “Interesting theory. Now how do you suggest we actually implement your Wonderful Idea?”
Crickets and tumble weeds.
Kinda like this scene in The Hunt for Red October: “What’s his plan? Russians don’t take a dump, son, without a plan. Senior captains don’t start something this dangerous without having thought the matter through. What’s he going to do, sail into New York, pop the hatch, and say here I am? And I don’t think your notion of a few days inspection’s going to wash either. In order to be of any value, you’d have to tear it apart. Hell, the metallurgy alone would take a couple of months. Then we’d have to keep it. What will you do with the crew? The ones that don’t defect will go back and say we got the boat. Or do you plan to eliminate them? So you have to get them off the boat in such a way that they think we don’t have it, and they’ll report that we don’t have it to their bosses. Otherwise, this whole business is just academic, right?”
Right.
As one who yesterday said he enjoyed Atlas Shrugged and found some good warnings therein, I feel I should mention that I most definitely NOT a Randian. I enjoyed the book as I enjoy other sci-fi and fantasy books, it’s mind-candy for the commute by public transportation, especially the commute home when my brain is fried and anything more taxing than Dr Seuss makes my head hurt.
I don’t think “Going Galt” is a viable way to influence the world (although going off and living in a cabin in the woods away from the majority of my fellow homo sapiens sometimes has some appeal. That would be entirely for my sake, not to bring about a new world order).
The good points I see (done in an admittedly ham-handed manner) reduce to “If you do this thing (whatever Socialist wet-dream is the current rage) then Bad Things ™ will happen, because you neglected to take human nature into account.” Could those messages be done better? Of course. HAVE they been done better? Certainly. Still, if a college kid picks up Atlas Shrugged because everyone is reading it and is exposed, perhaps for the first time, to these warnings I consider that a good thing. Then they have to come HERE and learn the truth, that John Galt and company are not coming forth from the Rockies to save the world.
Thanks Og, for the discussion. It’s helped me a great deal to clarify my own thinking on the issues involved. If you ever find yourself in the northern NJ/NYC area let me know, I’d like to buy you a beer or ten.
Mark:
There is no question that the basic ideas are sound, that taking from people who produce is bad- but no human being can ever be as one-dimensional as Rand’s characters. A powerful lot of the people who are on the side of good have their own flaws; how many republican senators/politicians will be thrown out of office this week for dipping their pens where they shouldn’t? And an awful lot of the people on the side of bad are just trying to make the world a better place in their ignorance?
Human nature defines and is defined by dichotomy. Not everything is what it seems, and even when it is, that doesn’t make it good or bad or right or wrong.
The questions asked by Atlas Shrugged are neatly answered therin, and those answers are supremely wrong. the people who abide by those answers as if they were “the” answer, are a huge danger to real conservatism and civil libertarianism, because, as I’ve said before, they represent the right’s version of Fahrenheit 911 true believers.
And you don’t want me drunk in your town, but I’d meet you for a coffee if I ever get that way.