Our words, ourselves
Pascal intones here that the conservative media, what there is of it, is largely composed of researchers that cherry pick the best of the best of everyone else’s thoughts.
More than once I’ve heard words coined by fellow bloggers on talk radio- the guys at WLS clearly read Ed Hering’s blog, because not two days after he said of the GOP budget cuts “That’s not a budget cut- it’s a rounding error!” the guys on WLS repeated it word for word.
The problem is, the conservative media takes these things, cherrypicks the stuff that’s sound-bite worthy, and broadcasts them without the background of the rest of the well thought out posts. That is what the Republican party has become; a caricature of the sound bites culled from the best conservative thinkers, while the substance of the average Republican politician is no dramatically different than a democrat.
The Tea party began by including not the sound bites, but the substance, of what people think. We want a constitutional government. We want a small government. We want to be protected in our sleep. We want our money, our children, and our lives to be left alone.
The right has been espousing these ideas in symbol but not in substance for so long, that they believe the symbol has become the substance, It has not. We can see through the ever-thinning veil of BS, and we’re tired of it. The tea party may not be the best solution, but it has certainly provided a tangible threat to the right and the left, and it’s clear both parties are threatened.
Keep your voice strong, and keep saying the things that matter to you. You alone know what you want, don’t wait for some talk show fool to take what they like of your message and turn it into a rallying cry to get some empty suit elected. if you only reach four people, you have reached someone. Not everyone will agree with you, and maybe you should look at what they have to say, because it may have merit, and may encompass some truths of which you are not aware. But keep yapping.
10 comments Og | Uncategorized

“Keep your voice strong, and keep saying the things that matter to you.”
Excellent advice, Og. This is the reason I keep coming here – a strong voice.
That is what I will keep doing over on my blog. The posts I like are the posts in my voice – steadfast and unyielding.
Amen brother.
I do not disagree with the substantive call to keep our voices strong. I think Rush and others do read the blogs, and before the blogs they read the NYT and WSJ. I’m happier that they’re quoting us. When I’m at work I don’t have time to read blogs, but I can listen. I am thankful for good ideas wherever they spring from.
However, the old “that’s not a [insert fiscal term here], that’s a rounding error,” has been around the block for decades. Google will attest to that.
Now today, I excoriated Boehner’s Twitter secretary for an execrable statement about how great the CR was and now the GOP was waiting for Obama to lead on the budget deficit. If you see something in the next few days along the lines of “Why wait for what will never come? Leaders LEAD. Any stewardess can point to the exits,” then you’ll know they’re cherry picking! For the record, there were many respondents to that statement along very similar lines, but no one compared Boehner to a stewardess.
That’s how you keep your voice strong: think of ways to keep it vivid and unique among the many good minds that think alike. Watermark your statements by going the extra mile in your expression of them.
Recognize that our common “sense of things” is what the Left fears most. The sheer numbers that Palin could conjure up is what they fear, not her personally. They’ve done an artful job of dividing those numbers from within and without the Conservative voice.
“That’s how you keep your voice strong: think of ways to keep it vivid and unique among the many good minds that think alike. Watermark your statements by going the extra mile in your expression of them.”
Excellent way to express this. This is something I have been thinking about recently and I really like the way that you phrased it. Thank you!
“However, the old “that’s not a [insert fiscal term here], that’s a rounding error,†has been around the block for decades. Google will attest to that.”
The point was not the phrase, but how it was used, specifically, and it was clear it could only have come from one source, as the whole discussion was practically lifted verbatim from Ed’s blog, sorry maybe I didn’t make that adequately clear. I was born at night, but not last night.;) I understand the “Rounding error” expression was not new.
Well, I wasn’t aware of a “whole discussion” but I get your point, and am glad you’re not as young as you seemed! Wait, is that a good thing?
:o)
Pascal and I discussed this, too. I guess that for me, if I can phrase something enough for it to land in the common areas of the Acropolis, then it’s a win for everyone. Sure, I like credit, but in the field of ideas and in the fight for Truth, however and whatever I can do to get it out there is always a WIN.
But we all know one thing for sure: if we vote for soundbites instead of proven actions, we’ll get another RINObama. (Hey! I like that: RINObama. Now I gotta go google it.)
lol.
Joan: I may not be that old, but I got a lot of miles, and they’re all hard miles.
On the other hand, being old doesn’t mean I can’t be immature.
“…don’t wait for some talk show fool to take what they like of your message and turn it into a rallying cry to get some empty suit elected. ”
I agree. there is a BIG difference between a (using Steven Den Beste’s term)
‘Linker and a Thinker’ ™
Which kind of person do you want in office? How do you know one form the other? Some jobs are best as an idea clearinghouse (linker), others really need to really know what the heck they are talking about and perform accordingly (Thinker).
Update:
Saying in his 2nd hour “This is something out of a total dictatorship: locking out the press and then giving yourself an award for openness,” Michael Savage explicitly gave credit to JammieWearingFool for his story “Obama to Hold Four Meetings Closed to the Press Today, Then Will Accept Openness Award.”
I hope this reformed behavior had something to do with our discussion here.
That would be nice!