At Eternity Road
one of my most important daily reads, Mr Porretto discusses, on Christmas Day, the question of “How can G-d allow suffering in the world”
One of the actual tests of a person’s Christianity, in my head, is the way they deal with that question.
The person to whom the post was directed asks this question, and Mr P, with his typical aplomb, gives plenty of reasonable answers. The bottomline, being, “God does not cause or allow human suffering, Humans do” (apologies for cutting to the Cliffs notes chase on that, read the original post if you want to absorb Mr P’s full monty on the subject)
So I disobeyed my own rule against proselytizing and jumped in with both feet, and it became apparent very quickly that RegT was not interested- at all- in actually learning anything.
The one noters, the one trick ponies, are invariably the ones who have the agenda. Like the ubiquitous MikeB who floats around the gunboards, and all the others like him, his “Why does God allow X to happen to Y?” is not a legitimate question seeking a real answer, it’s a hammer to attempt to weaken the faith of others. A person legitimately interested in learning will ask questions, listen to the answers, and try to understand. The agenda driven will only repeat their talking points list of denials and refutations.
Don’t waste your time. This just reinforces my rule: Pray for these people, but don’t try to “Fix” them or “convert” them. They have been damaged at best or turned toward evil at worst; it is not in your power to make it any different. People who want to change- really want to change- will do so. They do so on their own, and no outside influence can change that. Oh, sure, you can help someone who wants to recover, but like the psychiatrist and the light bulb, it has to want to change.
Anyone who has ever been to a few AA meetings understands this. Anyone who has spent time around junkies knows this. If you have so much of your psyche invested in your bottle, or the spike, or the idea that people shouldn’t own firearms, or smoke, or have faith in G-d, there isn’t anything I or anyone else can do for you to change that. it’s just not going to happen.
So, pray for those folks. (You’ll usually get people who will say “Don’t waste your prayers on me!”. Usually this is out of fear- fear that those prayers might succeed) Only the individual can make that choice, and the longer i live the more I realize this to be true. I would love to think I can be the agent of that kind of change, but that is certainly beyond my power, and beyond the power of almost everyone I know. If the words of Jesus Christ can’t convince you, how am I going to get anywhere?. Prayer is almost always the very best thing you can do, and it is one of the few things you can do that will certainly never harm anyone. Best part is, you can give your prayers, and it takes nothing from you at all. And the junkie, the alcoholic, the faithless are the people who need your prayers the most.
Once the person makes the decision, though, do whatever you can to help them make it stick. THAT is what you can do.

… it’s a hammer to attempt to weaken the faith of others.
Yep. And we’re exhorted to avoid foolish and unlearned questions. I will say this much, however, in defense of saying more.
I think we should engage the hard-headed with cheerful welcome and hard truth, but we should not attempt to be the sole source of their education. The old song, “God’s got an army” is apt to describe it. Some people need a whole army of truth-sayers before they get it.
So yeah, speak the truth. Say on. Then move on. There’s plenty more where we come from.
Nicely put, Joan. Me, I’m tired of wasting my time on fools, so I’ll leave that for younger, more patient people.
Prayer is almost always the very best thing you can do, and it is one of the few things you can do that will certainly never harm anyone. Best part is, you can give your prayers, and it takes nothing from you at all.
Amen.
The answer to his question is simple, two words: Free Will.
You can’t give a person faith, you can only give them facts. A few months back, I unwittingly took part in a successful “transformation” on John Shore’s blog. The Troll From Hell was insistent that the Christian Church is not responsible for the negative results of its doctrine. Several of us regular readers spent most of a week explaining his fallacies, working around his dodges and deflections, and presenting him with irrefutable facts. It. Was. Exhausting. and I’m not sure why I stuck it out, because that’s not normally my style. The debate ended in frustration, but not too long afterward, he came back, understanding that we were not wrong. I never would have guessed it, but he was not agenda-driven, he was sincere and merely naive. I have dealt with smug atheist trolls there as well. Once I explain to them that (religious doctrine aside)faith is as rational a choice as non-faith, according to their own arguments, they disappear. Simple logic and a stubborn determination to refuse to be distracted by red herrings, is a quick cure for agenda-driven trolls. It’s kinda fun to watch their vast bodies of “knowledge” smash into a wall of succinct facts.
Suz: It’s good to be consistent, and persistent, of course. But also don’t wrestle with a pig. You both get filthy, and the pig likes it
OK, I’ll step into the pigsty and take a crack at this greased pig.
First and foremost, there is NO “one size fits all” in ANY religion, especially, as I’ve noted, with Christianity. Those who maintain that there is, such as the old Calvinists with our religion, or the Islamists with Islam, or the ultr-Orthodox with the Jews, are wrong, and I don’t feel bad when I tell them that.
An individual’s religion means something unique that person. Take the exact same belief set and try to wrap it around another person, and you will find that it’s not as good a fit.
As I see Christianity, the only thing about it that is universal to all forms of the faith is the acceptance of the fact that God sent his only Son, Jesus Christ, to walk among us, spread the Word of God, and when the most imperfect among us said it was time to end that mission, God allowed the sacrifice of his son so that we, the imperfect, would have Jesus’ perfect example to live our lives by, and thereby be Saved. If you believe that, you are a Christian, if you don’t, you’re not. The universality of Christianity ends there, though.
Suz: note that in that definition of the universal part of Christianity, there is room for the “free will” of mankind. There is even room to accept other peoples’ faiths, because the one thing Christianity DOESN’T do is insist that everyone be Saved. There is plenty of room for heathens, and the Bible instructs us just how to deal with them. Some interpret those instructions to mean that all must be proselytized, hammered with the faith until they submit, but one may also interpret the instructions as to merely have pity on the un-Saved. I follow the latter view, but your mileage may vary.
Who says that God is even remotely interested in creating a just and good world? Who says that God’s idea of just and good is even remotely close to any single man’s interpretation of those words?
Maybe God knows something we don’t. Maybe he knows that intervening in the free will of men, even when it is the free will to do harm to children, is more evil than allowing that to happen. Maybe God sees our lives here on Earth and inconsequential in the grand scheme of things and so doesn’t pay much attention. Maybe he has far grander things to focus on.
Maybe there is no God.
Pondering such things doesn’t get anyone any closer to a destination that we want to arrive at. DOING SOMETHING to make the world a better place does. Whether there is a God or not, such action leaves the world a better place, and in a world where good and evil do inarguably exist, isn’t that enough?
DOING SOMETHING to make the world a better place does.
Ooh. Fucking Rah.
Thanks, Goob.