For three weeks
I stayed in rooms that were large and had wide doors, huge showers into which you could roll a Rascal if you were so inclined, tall toilets and functional remote controls.
Last week I stayed in a handicapped room. I know it was because it said so on the door. It had narrow doors, a bathtub too narrow for anyone not anorectic, and a low toilet. And the remote didn’t work. How is that a handicapped room?
It’s Truth in Advertising, at work.
See, the room wasn’t for a handicapped person…. rather, it is the room itself which was “handicapped”, per your description.
Poor, tiny, underequipped and inadequate room. I wonder if it’s nightly rate got a federal subsidy for being so disadvantaged?
You should be all full of smug liberal feelgoodness, for patronising such a repressed minority of a room.
See? Obvious, and hidden in plain sight!
Jim
Sunk New Dawn
Galveston, TX
roflmao. Very nice, I like that!
Curses, foiled again. I was thinking the same thing as Jim…the room WAS handicapped. Although, the PC descriptive for it would be ‘Amenity Challenged’.
Maybe it was not intended for a physical handicap?
Then it was probably the perfect room for me!
The term handicapped applied to the room, not the occupant.
Okay, I should have read Jim’s response before attempting to be clever. I’ll never have an original idea.
it is important that you contribute, Ma’am.