I have always been
A sucker for a happy ending. That’s why the Discworld books appealed to me so much, they had their moments but in the end things worked out. Mostly only people who were assholes died. And good people were rewarded, or at least lived fairly happily.
 There are quite a few books like that. I don’t need to read about the hero dying, I see that. I know enough of it from real life that I may have perhaps become somewhat jaded. I have carried a lot of good friends and family to holes in the ground. I have seen most of the ways people can be bastards, and many of the ways people can be bastards to one another. I am seldom surprised by the way people are, and I am often thought of as emotionless because I don’t react strongly when I see people being assholes. I have come to expect it.
Â
On the other hand, when people in real life do good things, it warms me, like nothing else. Even a well written story with a good ending can moisten my eyes. All of this is because I like it when people choose their better angels and do good things, or even do the right thing, when the right thing is the hard thing. And it does happen, in the real world, though it seems to happen less and less these days, or maybe I’m just growing old.
Â
When you train a dog, or raise a child, you must establish a set of rules, and those rules must be hard and fast. The dog or the child may chafe at the authority, but they are both better for it. No child or dog benefits from long term unfettered freedom of action, without consequence there is no learning.
In this same way we make law. A lot of the law is based on old religious law, because a lot of that is pretty good foundation. As things change,the law changes, and invariably, it grows.
 Everyone yearns to be free. From the moment you are told that you cannot stay up and watch that certain television show to the desire (Some of us have) to start the car and just drive, we want to be free. In that freedom there is responsibility, and soon enough we learn on our own that we must balance our freedom with our responsabilities. Nobody will pay our way as we “Find ourselves” because you just might not be there to find you. A lot of parents allow their children the “Freedom” to do the things they always dreamed of,even going so far as to finance their journey of self discovery, only to find it makes them spoiled brats who want to have the world handed to them. A powerful lot of the time, those people find themselves attracted to places where the rules are strict and rigid, and fit in perfectly because they crave that structure and orderliness, no matter how ignorant it is. Case in point: Cat Stevens. Apparently raised by wolves, he was fascinated by the Koran and decided he would abandon his “Worldly ways” for a life of devotion to Islam.
What a crock of shit. islam gave unrelenting structure, and the perpetual adolescent Stevens craved that. All perpetual adolescents do- no matter how much they may bitch and chafe at the rules imposed on them, they want that structure.
Â
Adults do not need the external structure, they have shed the exoskeleton of structure for an endoskeleton of moral structure that supports and sustains them, because it comes from within. Most “Progressives” think of themselves as the “Learned” and “Evolved” because they just know that everyone needs that exoskeleton of the Law to keep them in line and happy. We do not need it, because we are adults, but they never understand that point- being incapable of standing on their own without the exoskeleton of the burgeoning Law, they expect we need it too.
Â
The world, today, is less warm and welcoming than when I grew up, and part of the hardness comes from people who would impose their will on those of us who wish to be free. It makes it ever rarer to see people going out of their way to be decent to one another. I hate this. I want it to change. I have no idea how to accomplish that- well, I have some idea, but my ideas are not very popular.
A lot of people think that it is possible to ‘Educate” those crustacea, those jellyfish that require an external support to give them form, but you cannot. They have a fact proof screen. While you struggle to bring them to the light they drag all of western civilization into the darkness.
Â
In Fahrenheit 451 Bradbury talks about a world where people who have a bit of literature in their head are valued, so that it doesn’t become lost. Bradbury is as wrong about this as Asimov is wrong about robotics; it is not literature that we must fear losing, it’s self reliance and self sufficiency. We have to save these things and teach them to our children- clandestinely, if we must, but they have to learn. And you can’t just teach them to stand on their own two feet, you have to teach them to teach others. Therin lies the salvation of civilization. We may have a lot of bad days ahead, but this can give us that happy ending.
Â
18 comments Og | Uncategorized

Perfect. There’s a lot to chew on here, but for now I am content to consider much of the elite nanny-state to be the Crustacean Class.
“A lot of parents allow their children the “Freedom†to do the things they always dreamed of,even going so far as to finance their journey of self discovery, only to find it makes them spoiled brats who want to have the world handed to them. A powerful lot of the time, those people find themselves attracted to places where the rules are strict and rigid, and fit in perfectly because they crave that structure and orderliness, no matter how ignorant it is.”
Mea culpa, I have to admit. It’s why I was drawn to the military, and happy with others making my life decisions for me.
Great essay, Og.
Hey- at least you chose your structure wisely.
I would add (and it may already be there, wouldn’t be the first time I missed something while reading) “consistency” to the mix provided above. If children are not faced with the same result for the same action, they will come to be as “screwed” as if there was no guidelines/rules laid down in the first place.
Also, I went into the military right out of high school, for a number of reasons. One of those was to have that consistency of reactions, that same set of expectations which had been applied at home, continued on, via the military. So it wasn’t looking for a new set of boundaries, rather a continuation of those already established by my parents, grandparents, and others.
Sheesh, please remove the first, and keep the second one. Damn computer lag!!!
lol. Crap, already deleted the wrong one!
Sorry, Guy. but yeah, I get you completely.
FWIW – related to “liking books with happy endings” – you may want to check out some posts spearheaded in large part by semi-indie (she’s published at Baen) author Sarah Hoyt at http://accordingtohoyt.com…
Some deeply purple, if not outright red-pill attitudes on her part as well. She at least recognizes that men and women are, well, different.
Should have mentioned the term to look for – “Human Wave”
I had to tell my son today the then next time some one smacks him at school he needs to yell is a loud and clear voice Ow.
I would rather he clean the kids clock, but the other is a friend and, get this, a fellow scout.
The school is forcing me to this solution. I think we will be home schooling him next year as I do not want him in the public schools.
I cannot even being to talk with the teacher nor am I going to try.
I am sadden by the overall state of affairs we have allowed this country to come to.
Make sure he yells the kids name too
Fahrenheit 451 is one of my favorite books ever.
I submit that in Bradbury’s story, literature (and the knowledge it brings) is a form of self-reliance. Characters who watch the telescreens are complacent and disconnected from reality, both internally and externally. It’s more cerebral than Heinlein’s “specialization is for insects” creed, but I think in its way it’s just as important. What’s the point of knowing how to build a library if there’s nothing to put in it?
Whats the point of having a library full of books if you have nothing to eat?
And what’s the point of eating if that’s all there is to do? My point is that the jellyfish you talk about are no more capable of preserving the achievements of humanity than they are of surviving a week in the woods. Bradbury’s story used a simplified premise to illustrate a larger theme — that there’s no point surviving as a species if simply surviving is the only goal.
Besides, if you read the rest of his work, all of his characters are fairly capable human beings unless indicated otherwise. And the ones that aren’t don’t fare well, and are hardly ever the heroes.
My point is that there is absolutely no impediment to the survival of literature. Self sufficiency, on the other hand, is all but gone.
My point is that there is absolutely no impediment to the survival of literature.
It’s called “apathy, born of comfortable ignorance”. It’s more dangerous to literature and art and music than mold and water and fire ever could be. Put it all on a Venn Diagram and you’ll find significant overlap between “can’t choose a restaurant to save her life, much less cook a meal” and “thinks George Eliot and George Michael are the same person”. Call it a tier 2 problem if you will, but it’s still a problem.
No, it’s not. What you’re discussing is perception of literature, not the literature itself. I have a kindle. On it are literally hundreds of books, and I charge it almost exclusively from a harbor freight solar cell. Even if the battery dies altogether, the storage is such that the words will remain. And this is but one kindle of millions, and there are millions of hard books,and there are millions more in untold places.
If the race dies, it is all lost. If the race survives, someday, sooner or later, it will all become of value again to someone. Witness the Epic of Gilgamesh, or Beowulf. I have zero concern that the artistic creation of the past will be lost. Even if it were, the nature of man is to create, so new artistic vision will arise, it won’t be just survival anymore than the hominids in Chauvet were merely surviving. Art will always be with us, in one form or another, as long as we’re still here.
As long as we’re still here.
I can probably drag a net down Michigan Avenue in Chicago and find ten thousand liberal arts students who understand the nuances of Hemingway or Joyce or Blake better than i. I bet i can’t find, in that same group, five who can kill an animal, make a fire, and cook it.
Yes, that is becoming a rare thing. The ability to find food for oneself in a place without refrigeration.
Og, good thought on the name, I’ll tell him that.
I am going to read a history of the roman empire. Since its fall triggered the dark ages, I thought it might give some interesting data points.
paul: While you’re at it, read ‘How the irish saved civilization”
Very good