I wonder why it is
that some individual hasn’t used Ferguson to put the final nail in the coffin of Gun Control? “The man wants the po-leese to have guns but not US!!!” I mean, an enterprising race hustler could turn this into the next big cause, right?
Thankfully most the gun nuts don’t think like that. Facts are a better weapon than hyperbole, in the long run.
It’ll be used to promote gun control. The guns cause the crime you see, so if there were no guns there’d be no crime, thus no need for police with guns (or police at all), and we’ll all live happily ever after.
They really DO think that way.
I wouldnt call it thought myself, but yeah.
If leftists interpreted the 2nd with the same voracity they do their favorite amendments they would be calling for Federal subsidies so that Po Folk could afford the same quality armaments as Rich Folk.
I mean, why shouldn’t the losers-in-life’s-lottery not have the same capacity of personal protection as the evil winners-of-life’s-lottery??? Are we to deny a Citizen the Right Of Self-Protection simply because he can’t afford it??? How cold, callous, hard-hearted, mean-spirited and Racist!!!
It’s a Civil Rights issue, by God!!!
Message for you, sir!
Lol. Thanks, Tam! I love that.
People have been trying to do that for years, but too many people on the “other side” of the cultural debate are now just Sure that Guns Are Bad.
Reminding them of the Deacons of Defense just confuses them.
The people who are anti-police are also anti-gun. The aim is to break down social order so the proles BEG for their betters to put on their face-stompin’ boots.