Gender roles and entertainment.
At present, there are two works in the public eye that deal with gender roles, the first and most prominent being Brokeback Mountain.
Brokeback mountain is a film I will not see. It may be good, it may be great, but I’m just not interested, because it is taken from a short story (I believe) from Annie Prolx’s collection of shorts, “Wyoming stories”.
Annie P. is a great writer, from a technical standpoint, and her other major work, “Shipping News” is a great read. I have enjoyed reading it and re-reading it. There is a problem at it’s core, though, and that is that the narrative is basically the internal dialog of a man, and such a man has never walked the planet. Annie basically wrote about a man who at heart is a woman, because she only has that viewpoint. To write about two ranchhands, she’s going to be stretching, and stretching badly. There’s no doubt that she can write well, but she will never be the man she seems desperate to be.
On the other hand, Norah Vincent did get to be a man, and seems to have learned something, which you can tell by reading excerpts from her book “Self Made Man” in which she masquerades as a man for a year and a half,and reports back on her findings. In various interviews about the books she says things like “I went into this expecting to find that men are needy and less evolved, and that turned out not to be so”. Well, duh. There has always seemed to be a certain faction of the lesbian community hell-bent on declaring men useless and obsolete, it’s interesting to see one of that kind see men in a different light. In an interview for the Sun TImes she states
“Dating women as a man was a lesson in female power, and it made me, of all things, into a momentary misogynist, which, I suppose was the best indicator that my experiment had worked…. I saw my own sex from the other side, and I disliked women irrationally for a while because of it. …”
Another “duh” moment. Look, ladies: We try to grok you, but we don’t. You try to grok us, but you don’t. We are all different, not only as sexes but as individuals. Even identical twins cannot truly know what the other feels. How about we deal with one another as individuals? And for the militant homosexuals trying to remake the world in their image, we don’t really care what you want, as long as you don’t jam it down our throats (sic).
Me, I’m gonna go watch some old John Wayne movies.
13 comments Og | Uncategorized

Men are from Mars, women are from the Andromeda Galaxy.
I have never understood or approved of how most women tolerate and embrace homosexuality.
I wont see the movie either Og. I won’t go to a chick flick, and I won’t go to a chick with a dick flick either, HAR HAR HAR!
I am one of the old dinosauers that thinks homosexuality is an indicator of mental illness.
Jim
No, no interest whatever in a movie where two sheepherders wind up boinking each other.
And all the ‘critical acclaim’ reinforces my decision years ago to totally disregard whatever a movie critic says, and to ignore awards nominations.
Og-
We watched “The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance” tonight- good stuff. Makes you all warm & fuzzy inside for the quality of its’ production. Not once in the movie did I see any penis wagging. Like I said, good movie.
Good, I see I’ve been vindicated by yet another real man.
A have zero intrest in that flick, and I really don’t give a flying damn about expanding my horizons anymore this year.
Too damn bad.
I read Self-Made Man last week. It was pretty good, altho I think Norah didn’t get quite as much insight as she thinks she did. I wonder if it says anything that she seems to have gone after a lower-class experience.
I have no interest in that movie because it looks so sappy. Wouldn’t be interested if it involved two straight people. I suspect that the movie has gotten great reviews only because most libshits are afraid to say that anything involving a minority (oppressed people, whatever) is bad. (Sorta like if you say Jesse Jackson is an idiot, you will be called a rascist, even though the man clearly is an idiot no matter what his skin color.)
Judging from the commentary of some reasonable people who actually _have_ seen it, it seems like most of the folks cheering for the movie aren’t really paying much attention to the content. It’s much more a tale of the emotional perils of adultery than a paean to gay sex.
Still not interested in seeing it myself, though.
If I were to see it, it would be more or less to see how much is propaganda and how little of it is really art. But, I can’t force myself to go…the interest just isn’t there.
I watched the movie last weekend and its about more than two sheepherders boinking eachother, I think its a demonstration of how society disregards anything that’s different from what is considered the norm. Either way, homosexuality doesn’t seen anymore attractive to me now than before I saw it, I just understand the viewpoint.
There’s alot of misogny in the movie
i hate this movie
what is wrong with a movie about LOVE people its more than just ‘BOINKING’!!!!!!!!!!!