Let me reveal what could’ve been your editing there Mark. Then Tiberius, Caligula, Claudius, Nero Then Michelle. Then Chelsea. Then Malia. Then Sasha.
See, a millennia or two after the next Dark Ages, our posterity will figure we lost our republic only due to something in our water (like lead.) The few who figure it out — that it due to our failing in our effort to properly restrain human lust for power because we lost the vision when we abandoned our winning culture for pleasure seeking — will only be heeded for only a few years. And then, as now, the next band of bandits will be hard at work undermining them.
We could leave a record of unvarnished events, and if the record survives, our freedom finding posterity might be able to overcome their version of the Progs, but only if the plan includes an institutional hit squad and begins working MUCH earlier.
on 19 Mar 2015 at 9:33 am Professor Hale
No. Hillery, Bush, Michelle, Chelsea, Bush-Clinton, Clinton-Bush, then we just stop having elections and some anonymous overlord issues edicts signed, “The President”.
on 19 Mar 2015 at 2:13 pm blindshooter
I think I see what you were doing there, yes I always go and pull a lever. Most times not with great desire to see that particular person win but to keep the other one out.
Hey, I think that’s what a lot of Dems did in the 2008 primary.
Phew, good thing nothing bad happened by pulling the “not her” lever. :)
on 19 Mar 2015 at 3:45 pm Og
Shit, Rush was trying to get her nominated at the time. He knew what was coming.
on 19 Mar 2015 at 3:59 pm Ed Hering
I’ll continue to pull the “not Democrat” lever. I’m simply no longer going to automatically pull the “GOP” lever.
HIllary Clinton versus Mitt Romney in 2012 would have made me vote Romney. See, Hillary Clinton isn’t Obama; she’d be effective. With Obama, we have the clusterfuck-in-chief who spends more time preening and golfing than doing anything else.
So would Romney have been, and I dreaded a big government liberal who could get things done actually becoming President.
on 19 Mar 2015 at 7:49 pm mts1
I don’t know. I look at the 90s and every time Clinton came up with some haywire liberal idea, it got shot down, and he caved. As long as she has an opposition Congress with which to work, hers may be a moderate presidency. It’s her as chief with a compliant Congress that’s worrisome, but nothing riles the GOP base like her, so that’s unlikely. Plus, as Peggy Noonan said in a WSJ op-ed piece this past weekend, Hilary seems dog tired. If the theme of her term is “what difference does it make,” and she reigns but does not rule, we may be in for a calm run until a real leader comes. And if she’s the hawk her husband was, and I think she’d be more of a war president than he was, I don’t see the US putting up with the crap it puts up with now.
That’s the problem with Hillary – you don’t know what you will get. Will she be a hawk or a dove? Energetic or lazy? There is not much of a record to go on with State (nothing) Senator (nothing) First Lady (not much and luckily it failed).
In my mind though she would be a terrible choice for President and I too can hear the voting irregularity machine spooling up in the distance.
on 20 Mar 2015 at 7:17 am Professor Hale
The problem is that Obama has pulled the shrink wrapping off the magical nature of the Constitution and discovered that there is no enforcement in it. He proved that the President is above the law as long as he controls 40 percent of the Senate. And if you are above the law, you can literally do anything you want. Imagine Hillery with that power..
on 20 Mar 2015 at 7:24 am Og
I dont want to imagine anyone with that power.
on 20 Mar 2015 at 10:56 am Grey Mobius
I try to say that but I keep vomiting in the back of my mouth a little.
on 20 Mar 2015 at 10:57 am Og
Thats a pretty normal reaction, i think.
on 20 Mar 2015 at 5:39 pm Paul B
The only news I am looking forward to is a funeral announcement.
Most likely bills being suffocated by some young harlot, but what do I know.
Then Michelle. Then Chelsea. Then Malia. Then Sasha.
I work with people who are serious about that.
Let me reveal what could’ve been your editing there Mark.
Then Tiberius, Caligula, Claudius, NeroThen Michelle. Then Chelsea. Then Malia. Then Sasha.See, a millennia or two after the next Dark Ages, our posterity will figure we lost our republic only due to something in our water (like lead.) The few who figure it out — that it due to our failing in our effort to properly restrain human lust for power because we lost the vision when we abandoned our winning culture for pleasure seeking — will only be heeded for only a few years. And then, as now, the next band of bandits will be hard at work undermining them.
We could leave a record of unvarnished events, and if the record survives, our freedom finding posterity might be able to overcome their version of the Progs, but only if the plan includes an institutional hit squad and begins working MUCH earlier.
No. Hillery, Bush, Michelle, Chelsea, Bush-Clinton, Clinton-Bush, then we just stop having elections and some anonymous overlord issues edicts signed, “The President”.
I think I see what you were doing there, yes I always go and pull a lever. Most times not with great desire to see that particular person win but to keep the other one out.
Indeed, Blind.
Hey, I think that’s what a lot of Dems did in the 2008 primary.
Phew, good thing nothing bad happened by pulling the “not her” lever. :)
Shit, Rush was trying to get her nominated at the time. He knew what was coming.
I’ll continue to pull the “not Democrat” lever. I’m simply no longer going to automatically pull the “GOP” lever.
HIllary Clinton versus Mitt Romney in 2012 would have made me vote Romney. See, Hillary Clinton isn’t Obama; she’d be effective. With Obama, we have the clusterfuck-in-chief who spends more time preening and golfing than doing anything else.
So would Romney have been, and I dreaded a big government liberal who could get things done actually becoming President.
I don’t know. I look at the 90s and every time Clinton came up with some haywire liberal idea, it got shot down, and he caved. As long as she has an opposition Congress with which to work, hers may be a moderate presidency. It’s her as chief with a compliant Congress that’s worrisome, but nothing riles the GOP base like her, so that’s unlikely. Plus, as Peggy Noonan said in a WSJ op-ed piece this past weekend, Hilary seems dog tired. If the theme of her term is “what difference does it make,” and she reigns but does not rule, we may be in for a calm run until a real leader comes. And if she’s the hawk her husband was, and I think she’d be more of a war president than he was, I don’t see the US putting up with the crap it puts up with now.
Writhing in orgasmic release.
You bastard.
That’s the problem with Hillary – you don’t know what you will get. Will she be a hawk or a dove? Energetic or lazy? There is not much of a record to go on with State (nothing) Senator (nothing) First Lady (not much and luckily it failed).
In my mind though she would be a terrible choice for President and I too can hear the voting irregularity machine spooling up in the distance.
The problem is that Obama has pulled the shrink wrapping off the magical nature of the Constitution and discovered that there is no enforcement in it. He proved that the President is above the law as long as he controls 40 percent of the Senate. And if you are above the law, you can literally do anything you want. Imagine Hillery with that power..
I dont want to imagine anyone with that power.
I try to say that but I keep vomiting in the back of my mouth a little.
Thats a pretty normal reaction, i think.
The only news I am looking forward to is a funeral announcement.
Most likely bills being suffocated by some young harlot, but what do I know.